↓ Skip to main content

Effects of fish oil supplementation on eicosanoid production in patients at higher risk for colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cancer Prevention: The Official Journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Effects of fish oil supplementation on eicosanoid production in patients at higher risk for colorectal cancer
Published in
European Journal of Cancer Prevention: The Official Journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), May 2019
DOI 10.1097/cej.0000000000000455
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maya N. White, Martha J. Shrubsole, Qiuyin Cai, Timothy Su, Jennings Hardee, John-Anthony Coppola, Sunny S. Cai, Stephanie M. Martin, Sandra Motley, Larry L. Swift, Ginger L. Milne, Wei Zheng, Qi Dai, Harvey J. Murff

Abstract

Fish oil supplementation may represent a potential chemopreventive agent for reducing colorectal cancer risk. The mechanism of action of fish oil is unknown but presumed to be related to eicosanoid modification. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of fish oil supplementation on the levels of urinary and rectal eicosanoids. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of 2.5 g of fish oil per day compared with olive oil supplementation over a 6-month period. Study participants had a history of colorectal adenomas. Randomization was stratified based on the gene variant rs174535 in the fatty acid desaturase 1 enzyme (FADS1), which affects tissue levels of arachidonic acid. A total of 141 participants were randomized. Urinary prostaglandin E2 metabolite (PGE-M) was measured at baseline, 3, and 6 months and rectal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) at baseline and 6 months. Repeated-measures linear regression was used to determine the effect of the intervention on each outcome measure. Overall, fish oil supplementation was found to reduce urinary PGE-M production compared with olive oil (P=0.03). Fish oil did not reduce rectal PGE2 overall; however, it did significantly reduce PGE2 in the subgroup of participants not using aspirin or NSAIDs (P=0.04). FADS1 genotype did not seem to modify effects of fish oil on PGE2 production. We conclude that fish oil supplementation has a modest but beneficial effect on eicosanoids associated with colorectal carcinogenesis, particularly in those not taking aspirin or NSAIDs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 21 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Unspecified 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,202,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer Prevention: The Official Journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)
#80
of 1,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,661
of 363,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer Prevention: The Official Journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.