Title |
Development and Standardization of an Improved Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Score for Use in Newborn Screening and Incident Diagnosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diabetes Care, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.2337/dc18-1785 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Seth A. Sharp, Stephen S. Rich, Andrew R. Wood, Samuel E. Jones, Robin N. Beaumont, James W. Harrison, Darius A. Schneider, Jonathan M. Locke, Jess Tyrrell, Michael N. Weedon, William A. Hagopian, Richard A. Oram |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 12 | 22% |
United States | 9 | 16% |
Germany | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Belgium | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Finland | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 47% |
Scientists | 26 | 47% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 227 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 47 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
Other | 31 | 14% |
Unknown | 64 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 10% |
Mathematics | 5 | 2% |
Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
Other | 29 | 13% |
Unknown | 72 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#226,266
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Care
#292
of 10,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,861
of 450,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Care
#4
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.