| Title |
An ethical pathway for gene editing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bioethics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/bioe.12570 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julian Savulescu, Peter Singer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 9% |
| Spain | 8 | 9% |
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Italy | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Belgium | 3 | 4% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 65% |
| Scientists | 23 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Researcher | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 10 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#633,778
of 25,463,091 outputs
Outputs from Bioethics
#38
of 1,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,798
of 447,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioethics
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.