| Title |
Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31940-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenny Lord, Dominic J McMullan, Ruth Y Eberhardt, Gabriele Rinck, Susan J Hamilton, Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones, Elena Prigmore, Rebecca Keelagher, Sunayna K Best, Georgina K Carey, Rhiannon Mellis, Sarah Robart, Ian R Berry, Kate E Chandler, Deirdre Cilliers, Lara Cresswell, Sandra L Edwards, Carol Gardiner, Alex Henderson, Simon T Holden, Tessa Homfray, Tracy Lester, Rebecca A Lewis, Ruth Newbury-Ecob, Katrina Prescott, Oliver W Quarrell, Simon C Ramsden, Eileen Roberts, Dagmar Tapon, Madeleine J Tooley, Pradeep C Vasudevan, Astrid P Weber, Diana G Wellesley, Paul Westwood, Helen White, Michael Parker, Denise Williams, Lucy Jenkins, Richard H Scott, Mark D Kilby, Lyn S Chitty, Matthew E Hurles, Eamonn R Maher, Prenatal Assessment of Genomes and Exomes Consortium, Mark Bateman, Ian R Berry, Sunayna K Best, Carolyn Campbell, Jenni Campbell, Georgina Carey, Kate E Chandler, Lyn S Chitty, Deirdre Cilliers, Kelly Cohen, Emma Collingwood, Panayiotis Constantinou, Lara Cresswell, Catherine Delmege, Ruth Y Eberhardt, Sandra L Edwards, Richard Ellis, Jerry Evans, Thomas Everett, Clare F Pinto, Natalie Forrester, Emma Fowler, Carol Gardiner, Susan Hamilton, Karen Healey, Alex Henderson, Simon T Holden, Tessa Homfray, Rebecca Hudson, Matthew E Hurles, Lucy Jenkins, Rebecca Keelagher, Mark D Kilby, Tracey Lester, Rebecca Lewis, Jenny Lord, Eamonn R Maher, Tamas Marton, Dominic J McMullan, Sarju Mehta, Rhiannon Mellis, Ruth Newbury-Ecob, Soo-Mi Park, Michael Parker, Katrina Prescott, Elena Prigmore, Oliver W Quarrell, Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones, Simon C Ramsden, Gabriele Rinck, Sarah Robart, Eileen Roberts, Jayne Rowland, Richard H Scott, James Steer, Dagmar Tapon, Emma J Taylor, Madeleine J Tooley, Pradeep C Vasudevan, Astrid P Weber, Diana G Wellesley, Paul Westwood, Helen White, Denise Williams, Elizabeth Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 33 | 32% |
| United States | 8 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Israel | 2 | 2% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 43 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 43% |
| Scientists | 37 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 453 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 11% |
| Other | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 89 | 20% |
| Unknown | 160 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 77 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 49 | 11% |
| Unknown | 171 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 221. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#177,102
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,149
of 42,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,734
of 449,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#51
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.