| Title |
Evaluating a custom-designed aid to improve communication of genetic results in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026627 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte Burns, Laura Yeates, Christopher Semsarian, Jodie Ingles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 53% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,128,033
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#7,440
of 25,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,002
of 448,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#250
of 688 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 688 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.