| Title |
Tracing outbreaks with machine learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Microbiology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41579-019-0153-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole E. Wheeler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 27 | 28% |
| United States | 17 | 18% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 60 | 62% |
| Members of the public | 34 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#822,020
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#409
of 2,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,053
of 458,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#12
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.