↓ Skip to main content

Guidance for the evaluation and treatment of hereditary and acquired thrombophilia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
397 Mendeley
Title
Guidance for the evaluation and treatment of hereditary and acquired thrombophilia
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11239-015-1316-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott M. Stevens, Scott C. Woller, Kenneth A. Bauer, Raj Kasthuri, Mary Cushman, Michael Streiff, Wendy Lim, James D. Douketis

Abstract

Thrombophilias are hereditary and/or acquired conditions that predispose patients to thrombosis. Testing for thrombophilia is commonly performed in patients with venous thrombosis and their relatives; however such testing usually does not provide information that impacts management and may result in harm. This manuscript, initiated by the Anticoagulation Forum, provides clinical guidance for thrombophilia testing in five clinical situations: following 1) provoked venous thromboembolism, 2) unprovoked venous thromboembolism; 3) in relatives of patients with thrombosis, 4) in female relatives of patients with thrombosis considering estrogen use; and 5) in female relatives of patients with thrombosis who are considering pregnancy. Additionally, guidance is provided regarding the timing of thrombophilia testing. The role of thrombophilia testing in arterial thrombosis and for evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss is not addressed. Statements are based on existing guidelines and consensus expert opinion where guidelines are lacking. We recommend that thrombophilia testing not be performed in most situations. When performed, it should be used in a highly selective manner, and only in circumstances where the information obtained will influence a decision important to the patient, and outweigh the potential risks of testing. Testing should not be performed during acute thrombosis or during the initial (3-month) period of anticoagulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 391 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 60 15%
Student > Bachelor 51 13%
Researcher 44 11%
Student > Postgraduate 35 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Other 91 23%
Unknown 86 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 203 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 103 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,320,521
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#101
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,595
of 406,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.