| Title |
Implementing personalized pathways for cancer follow‐up care in the United States: Proceedings from an American Cancer Society–American Society of Clinical Oncology summit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians , March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3322/caac.21558 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catherine M. Alfano, Deborah K. Mayer, Smita Bhatia, Jane Maher, Jessica M. Scott, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Janette K. Merrill, Tara O. Henderson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
| Australia | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 57% |
| Scientists | 12 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 15% |
| Psychology | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#787,734
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
#182
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,308
of 366,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 79.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.