| Title |
Australasian Gastrointestinal Pathology Society (AGPS) consensus guidelines for universal defective mismatch repair testing in colorectal carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pathology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pathol.2018.11.014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masato Yozu, M Priyanthi Kumarasinghe, Ian S Brown, Anthony J Gill, Christophe Rosty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 21% |
| Australia | 5 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 66% |
| Scientists | 6 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,008,244
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Pathology
#46
of 1,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,340
of 366,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,528 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.