| Title |
Medical data quality assessment: On the development of an automated framework for medical data curation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computers in Biology & Medicine, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.03.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vasileios C Pezoulas, Konstantina D Kourou, Fanis Kalatzis, Themis P Exarchos, Aliki Venetsanopoulou, Evi Zampeli, Saviana Gandolfo, Fotini Skopouli, Salvatore De Vita, Athanasios G Tzioufas, Dimitrios I Fotiadis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 40 | 33% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Computers in Biology & Medicine
#1,982
of 2,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,479
of 365,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computers in Biology & Medicine
#23
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,768 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.