↓ Skip to main content

Biomolecular Databases and Subnetwork Identification Approaches of Interest to Big Data Community: An Expert Review

Overview of attention for article published in OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Biomolecular Databases and Subnetwork Identification Approaches of Interest to Big Data Community: An Expert Review
Published in
OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, March 2019
DOI 10.1089/omi.2018.0205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olfat Al-Harazi, Achraf El Allali, Dilek Colak

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing approaches and genome-wide studies have become essential for characterizing the mechanisms of human diseases. Consequently, many researchers have applied these approaches to discover the genetic/genomic causes of common complex and rare human diseases, generating multiomics big data that span the continuum of genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and many other system science fields. Therefore, there is a significant and unmet need for biological databases and tools that enable and empower the researchers to analyze, integrate, and make sense of big data. There are currently large number of databases that offer different types of biological information. In particular, the integration of gene expression profiles and protein-protein interaction networks provides a deeper understanding of the complex multilayered molecular architecture of human diseases. Therefore, there has been a growing interest in developing methodologies that integrate and contextualize big data from molecular interaction networks to identify biomarkers of human diseases at a subnetwork resolution as well. In this expert review, we provide a comprehensive summary of most popular biomolecular databases for molecular interactions (e.g., Biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and Search Tool for The Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins), gene-disease associations (e.g., Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, Disease-Gene Network, MalaCards), and population-specific databases (e.g., Human Genetic Variation Database), and describe some examples of their usage and potential applications. We also present the most recent subnetwork identification approaches and discuss their main advantages and limitations. As the field of data science continues to emerge, the present analysis offers a deeper and contextualized understanding of the available databases in molecular biomedicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Computer Science 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,789,745
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
#323
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,968
of 378,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.