↓ Skip to main content

ClinGen expert clinical validity curation of 164 hearing loss gene–disease pairs

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
ClinGen expert clinical validity curation of 164 hearing loss gene–disease pairs
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41436-019-0487-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina T. DiStefano, Sarah E. Hemphill, Andrea M. Oza, Rebecca K. Siegert, Andrew R. Grant, Madeline Y. Hughes, Brandon J. Cushman, Hela Azaiez, Kevin T. Booth, Alex Chapin, Hatice Duzkale, Tatsuo Matsunaga, Jun Shen, Wenying Zhang, Margaret Kenna, Lisa A. Schimmenti, Mustafa Tekin, Heidi L. Rehm, Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun, Sami S. Amr

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,109,630
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#733
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,002
of 364,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#24
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.