| Title |
Responsible data sharing in international health research: a systematic review of principles and norms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0359-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shona Kalkman, Menno Mostert, Christoph Gerlinger, Johannes J. M. van Delden, Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 14% |
| Austria | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 68% |
| Scientists | 10 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 227 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 82 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 50 | 22% |
| Unknown | 96 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#765,848
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#46
of 1,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,659
of 364,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.