Title |
Digital health benefits evaluation frameworks: building the evidence to support Australia's National Digital Health Strategy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Medical Journal of Australia, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.5694/mja2.50034 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Janice S Biggs, Andrea Willcocks, Mitchell Burger, Meredith AB Makeham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 6 | 55% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 19% |
Unknown | 21 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 19% |
Unknown | 23 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,083,782
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Medical Journal of Australia
#1,747
of 5,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,675
of 364,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Journal of Australia
#30
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.