| Title |
Recommendations for Clinical CYP2C9 Genotyping Allele Selection A Joint Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and College of American Pathologists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.04.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria M Pratt, Larisa H Cavallari, Andria L Del Tredici, Houda Hachad, Yuan Ji, Ann M Moyer, Stuart A Scott, Michelle Whirl-Carrillo, Karen E Weck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#733,521
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
#96
of 1,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,328
of 364,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.