| Title |
A computational method for the identification of Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya virus species and genotypes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007231 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vagner Fonseca, Pieter J. K. Libin, Kristof Theys, Nuno R. Faria, Marcio R. T. Nunes, Maria I. Restovic, Murilo Freire, Marta Giovanetti, Lize Cuypers, Ann Nowé, Ana Abecasis, Koen Deforche, Gilberto A. Santiago, Isadora C. de Siqueira, Emmanuel J. San, Kaliane C. B. Machado, Vasco Azevedo, Ana Maria Bispo-de Filippis, Rivaldo Venâncio da Cunha, Oliver G. Pybus, Anne-Mieke Vandamme, Luiz C. J. Alcantara, Tulio de Oliveira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| South Africa | 5 | 14% |
| Brazil | 4 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 57% |
| Scientists | 12 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,690,649
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#1,086
of 9,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,006
of 364,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#22
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.