| Title |
Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Primary Genetic Screening for Lynch Syndrome in the General Population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Prevention Research, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-10-0262 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tuan A. Dinh, Benjamin I. Rosner, James C. Atwood, C. Richard Boland, Sapna Syngal, Hans F. A. Vasen, Stephen B. Gruber, Randall W. Burt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,846,178
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Prevention Research
#191
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,659
of 180,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Prevention Research
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.