| Title |
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Virtual Reality in Pediatrics: Effects on Pain and Anxiety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anesthesia and analgesia, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1213/ane.0000000000004165 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin Eijlers, Elisabeth M. W. J. Utens, Lonneke M. Staals, Pieter F. A. de Nijs, Johan M. Berghmans, René M. H. Wijnen, Manon H. J. Hillegers, Bram Dierckx, Jeroen S. Legerstee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Serbia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Latvia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 620 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 620 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 66 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 10% |
| Researcher | 43 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 117 | 19% |
| Unknown | 260 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 81 | 13% |
| Psychology | 35 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 74 | 12% |
| Unknown | 282 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#866,046
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#149
of 8,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,952
of 364,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#3
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.