| Title |
Vagococcus bubulae sp. nov., isolated from ground beef, and Vagococcus vulneris sp. nov., isolated from a human foot wound
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1099/ijsem.0.003459 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia L Shewmaker, Anne M Whitney, Christopher A Gulvik, Ben W Humrighouse, Jarrett Gartin, Hercules Moura, John R Barr, Edward R B Moore, Roger Karlsson, Tatiana C A Pinto, Lucia M Teixeira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 23% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#4,027
of 10,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,840
of 363,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#62
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.