| Title |
Putative novel cps loci in a large global collection of pneumococci
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbial Genomics, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1099/mgen.0.000274 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andries J. van Tonder, Rebecca A. Gladstone, Stephanie W. Lo, Moon H. Nahm, Mignon du Plessis, Jennifer Cornick, Brenda Kwambana-Adams, Shabir A. Madhi, Paulina A. Hawkins, Rachel Benisty, Ron Dagan, Dean Everett, Martin Antonio, Keith P. Klugman, Anne von Gottberg, Robert F. Breiman, Lesley McGee, Stephen D. Bentley, Abdullah W. Brooks, Alejandra Corso, Alexander Davydov, Andrew Pollard, Anna Skoczynska, Bernard Beall, Betuel Sigauque, Deborah Lehmann, Diego Faccone, Ekaterina Egorova, Elena Voropaeva, Eric Sampane-Donkor, Ewa Sadowy, Godfrey Bigogo, Helio Mucavele, Houria Belabbès, Idrissa Diawara, Jennifer Moïsi, Jennifer Verani, Jeremy Keenan, KL Ravikumar, Leonid Titov, Margaret Ip, Maria-Cristina de Cunto Brandileone, Hasanuzzaman, Metka Paragi, Naima Elmdaghri, Nicole Wolter, Noga Givon-Lavi, Özgen Köseoglu Eser, Pak Leung Ho, Patrick E. Akpaka, Paul Turner, Paula Gagetti, Peggy-Estelle Tientcheu, Philip E. Carter, Pierra Law, Rama Kandasamy, Rebecca Ford, Sadia Shakoor, Samanta Cristine Grassi Almeida, Samir K. Saha, Sanjay Doiphode, Susan A. Nzenze, Shamala Devi Sekaran, Somporn Srifuengfung, Stephen Obaro, Stuart C. Clarke, Tamara Kastrin, Theresa J. Ochoa, Veeraraghavan Balaji, Waleria Hryniewicz, Yulia Urban |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 42% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,651,753
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Genomics
#278
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,290
of 368,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Genomics
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.