| Title |
Cervical determinants of anal HPV infection and high-grade anal lesions in women: a collaborative pooled analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30164-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chunqing Lin, Jiri Slama, Paula Gonzalez, Marc T Goodman, Ningshao Xia, Aimée R Kreimer, Ting Wu, Nancy A Hessol, Yurii Shvetsov, Ana P Ortiz, Beatriz Grinsztejn, Anna-Barbara Moscicki, Isabelle Heard, María Del Refugio González Losa, Erna M Kojic, Maarten F Schim van der Loeff, Feixue Wei, Adhemar Longatto-Filho, Zizipho A Mbulawa, Joel M Palefsky, Annette H Sohn, Brenda Y Hernandez, Katina Robison, Steve Simpson, Lois J Conley, Alexandra de Pokomandy, Marianne A B van der Sande, Racheal S Dube Mandishora, Lays P B Volpini, Alessandra Pierangeli, Byron Romero, Timothy Wilkin, Silvia Franceschi, Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio, Reshmie A Ramautarsing, Ina U Park, Fernanda K Tso, Sheela Godbole, Kathleen W M D'Hauwers, Borek Sehnal, Lynette J Menezes, Sandra A Heráclio, Gary M Clifford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 27% |
| France | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 199 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 22% |
| Unknown | 61 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 27 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 70 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,591,418
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1,917
of 6,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,383
of 368,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#43
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.