↓ Skip to main content

Ethical issues in consumer genome sequencing: Use of consumers' samples and data

Overview of attention for article published in Applied and Translational Genomics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Ethical issues in consumer genome sequencing: Use of consumers' samples and data
Published in
Applied and Translational Genomics, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.atg.2016.01.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilia Niemiec, Heidi Carmen Howard

Abstract

High throughput approaches such as whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) create an unprecedented amount of data providing powerful resources for clinical care and research. Recently, WGS and WES services have been made available by commercial direct-to-consumer (DTC) companies. The DTC offer of genetic testing (GT) has already brought attention to potentially problematic issues such as the adequacy of consumers' informed consent and transparency of companies' research activities. In this study, we analysed the websites of four DTC GT companies offering WGS and/or WES with regard to their policies governing storage and future use of consumers' data and samples. The results are discussed in relation to recommendations and guiding principles such as the "Statement of the European Society of Human Genetics on DTC GT for health-related purposes" (2010) and the "Framework for responsible sharing of genomic and health-related data" (Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, 2014). The analysis reveals that some companies may store and use consumers' samples or sequencing data for unspecified research and share the data with third parties. Moreover, the companies do not provide sufficient or clear information to consumers about this, which can undermine the validity of the consent process. Furthermore, while all companies state that they provide privacy safeguards for data and mention the limitations of these, information about the possibility of re-identification is lacking. Finally, although the companies that may conduct research do include information regarding proprietary claims and commercialisation of the results, it is not clear whether consumers are aware of the consequences of these policies. These results indicate that DTC GT companies still need to improve the transparency regarding handling of consumers' samples and data, including having an explicit and clear consent process for research activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 12 8%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 12%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Computer Science 13 8%
Other 36 23%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,199,269
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Applied and Translational Genomics
#7
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,046
of 408,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied and Translational Genomics
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.