↓ Skip to main content

International clinical guidelines for the management of phosphomannomutase 2‐congenital disorders of glycosylation: Diagnosis, treatment and follow up

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
International clinical guidelines for the management of phosphomannomutase 2‐congenital disorders of glycosylation: Diagnosis, treatment and follow up
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/jimd.12024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruqaiah Altassan, Romain Péanne, Jaak Jaeken, Rita Barone, Muad Bidet, Delphine Borgel, Sandra Brasil, David Cassiman, Anna Cechova, David Coman, Javier Corral, Joana Correia, María Eugenia de la Morena‐Barrio, Pascale de Lonlay, Vanessa Dos Reis, Carlos R Ferreira, Agata Fiumara, Rita Francisco, Hudson Freeze, Simone Funke, Thatjana Gardeitchik, Matthijs Gert, Muriel Girad, Marisa Giros, Stephanie Grünewald, Trinidad Hernández‐Caselles, Tomas Honzik, Marlen Hutter, Donna Krasnewich, Christina Lam, Joy Lee, Dirk Lefeber, Dorinda Marques‐da‐Silva, Antonio F Martinez‐Monseny, Hossein Moravej, Katrin Õunap, Carlota Pascoal, Tiffany Pascreau, Marc Patterson, Dulce Quelhas, Kimiyo Raymond, Peymaneh Sarkhail, Manuel Schiff, Małgorzata Seroczyńska, Mercedes Serrano, Nathalie Seta, Jolanta Sykut‐Cegielska, Christian Thiel, Federic Tort, Mari‐Anne Vals, Paula Videira, Peter Witters, Renate Zeevaert, Eva Morava

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 10 10%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 31 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 40 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,748,124
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#214
of 1,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,093
of 443,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#4
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,834 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.