| Title |
Emerging Concepts in Precision Medicine and Cardiovascular Diseases in Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Research, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circresaha.119.314970 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
George A Mensah, Cashell Jaquish, Pothur Srinivas, George J Papanicolaou, Gina S Wei, Nicole Redmond, Megan C Roberts, Cheryl Nelson, Larissa Aviles-Santa, Mona Puggal, Melissa C Green Parker, Mollie A Minear, Whitney Barfield, Kathleen N Fenton, Cheryl Anne Boyce, Michael M Engelgau, Muin J Khoury |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 67% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 37 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,376,627
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Research
#2,666
of 7,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,725
of 367,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Research
#51
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.