↓ Skip to main content

Performance of Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 viral load plasma assay to accurately detect treatment failure.

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Performance of Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 viral load plasma assay to accurately detect treatment failure.
Published in
AIDS, October 2019
DOI 10.1097/qad.0000000000002303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jilian A Sacks, Youyi Fong, Mercedes Perez Gonzalez, Mauro Andreotti, Shrikala Baliga, Nigel Garrett, Jeanne Jordan, Etienne Karita, Smita Kulkarni, Orna Mor, Fausta Mosha, Zibusiso Ndlovu, Jean-Christophe Plantier, Shanmugam Saravanan, Lesley Scott, Trevor Peter, Meg Doherty, Lara Vojnov

Abstract

Coverage of viral load testing remains low with only half of the patients in need having adequate access. Alternative technologies to high throughput centralized machines can be used to support viral load scale-up; however, clinical performance data are lacking. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing the Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 viral load plasma assay to traditional laboratory-based technologies. Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 and comparator laboratory technology plasma viral load results were provided from 13 of the 19 eligible studies, which accounted for a total of 3790 paired data points. We used random effects models to determine the accuracy and misclassification at various treatment failure thresholds (detectable, 200, 400, 500, 600, 800 and 1000 copies/ml). Thirty percent of viral load test results were undetectable, while 45% were between detectable and 10 000 copies/ml and the remaining 25% were above 10 000 copies/ml. The median Xpert viral load was 119 copies/ml and the median comparator viral load was 157 copies/ml, while the log10 bias was 0.04 (0.02-0.07). The sensitivity and specificity to detect treatment failure were above 95% at all treatment failure thresholds, except for detectable, at which the sensitivity was 93.33% (95% confidence interval: 88.2-96.3) and specificity was 80.56% (95% CI: 64.6-90.4). The Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 viral load plasma assay results were highly comparable to laboratory-based technologies with limited bias and high sensitivity and specificity to detect treatment failure. Alternative specimen types and technologies that enable decentralized testing services can be considered to expand access to viral load.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,610,319
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from AIDS
#1,194
of 6,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,232
of 362,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS
#18
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.