Title |
Characterisation of infectious Ebola virus from the ongoing outbreak to guide response activities in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a phylogenetic and in vitro analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30291-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura K McMullan, Mike Flint, Ayan Chakrabarti, Lisa Guerrero, Michael K Lo, Danielle Porter, Stuart T Nichol, Christina F Spiropoulou, César Albariño |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 174 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 47 | 27% |
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 5 | 3% |
Spain | 4 | 2% |
France | 4 | 2% |
Australia | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
Colombia | 3 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
Other | 25 | 14% |
Unknown | 75 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 128 | 74% |
Scientists | 23 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 22% |
Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 38 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 285. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2020.
All research outputs
#125,838
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#350
of 6,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,347
of 363,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#9
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.