| Title |
CCMG practice guideline: laboratory guidelines for next-generation sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Genetics, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stacey Hume, Tanya N Nelson, Marsha Speevak, Elizabeth McCready, Ron Agatep, Harriet Feilotter, Jillian Parboosingh, Dimitri J Stavropoulos, Sherryl Taylor, Tracy L Stockley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 27% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 21% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 48 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,756,878
of 24,289,456 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#149
of 3,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,719
of 350,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,289,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.