| Title |
Methods for Development of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines: Recommendations in the Era of Guideline Transparency.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACP Journal Club, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.7326/m18-3445 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Holger J Schünemann, Donata Lerda, Nadya Dimitrova, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Axel Gräwingholt, Cecily Quinn, Markus Follmann, Robert Mansel, Francesco Sardanelli, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Annette Lebeau, Lennarth Nyström, Mireille Broeders, Lydia Ioannidou-Mouzaka, Stephen W Duffy, Bettina Borisch, Patricia Fitzpatrick, Solveig Hofvind, Xavier Castells, Livia Giordano, Sue Warman, Zuleika Saz-Parkinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 16% |
| Canada | 5 | 10% |
| Colombia | 3 | 6% |
| South Africa | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 70% |
| Scientists | 9 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 24% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,295,661
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from ACP Journal Club
#3,250
of 13,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,083
of 360,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACP Journal Club
#81
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.