| Title |
Exome sequencing of family trios from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study: Tapping into a rich resource of genetic and environmental data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Birth Defects Research, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/bdr2.1554 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary M. Jenkins, Lynn M. Almli, Faith Pangilinan, Jessica X. Chong, Elizabeth E. Blue, Stuart K. Shapira, Janson White, Daniel McGoldrick, Joshua D. Smith, James C. Mullikin, Christopher J. Bean, Wendy N. Nembhard, Xiang‐Yang Lou, Gary M. Shaw, Paul A. Romitti, Kim Keppler‐Noreuil, Mahsa M. Yazdy, Denise M. Kay, Tonia C. Carter, Andrew F. Olshan, Kristin J. Moore, Nanette Nascone‐Yoder, Richard H. Finnell, Philip J. Lupo, Marcia L. Feldkamp, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, The University of Washington Center for Mendelian Genomics, Deborah A. Nickerson, Michael J. Bamshad, Lawrence C. Brody, Jennita Reefhuis, Birth Defects Prevention Study |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,056,212
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Birth Defects Research
#114
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,552
of 358,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Birth Defects Research
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.