| Title |
The haematological consequences of Plasmodium vivax malaria after chloroquine treatment with and without primaquine: a WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1386-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert J. Commons, Julie A. Simpson, Kamala Thriemer, Cindy S. Chu, Nicholas M. Douglas, Tesfay Abreha, Sisay G. Alemu, Arletta Añez, Nicholas M. Anstey, Abraham Aseffa, Ashenafi Assefa, Ghulam R. Awab, J. Kevin Baird, Bridget E. Barber, Isabelle Borghini-Fuhrer, Umberto D’Alessandro, Prabin Dahal, André Daher, Peter J. de Vries, Annette Erhart, Margarete S. M. Gomes, Matthew J. Grigg, Jimee Hwang, Piet A. Kager, Tsige Ketema, Wasif A. Khan, Marcus V. G. Lacerda, Toby Leslie, Benedikt Ley, Kartini Lidia, Wuelton M. Monteiro, Dhelio B. Pereira, Giao T. Phan, Aung P. Phyo, Mark Rowland, Kavitha Saravu, Carol H. Sibley, André M. Siqueira, Kasia Stepniewska, Walter R. J. Taylor, Guy Thwaites, Binh Q. Tran, Tran T. Hien, José Luiz F. Vieira, Sonam Wangchuk, James Watson, Timothy William, Charles J. Woodrow, Francois Nosten, Philippe J. Guerin, Nicholas J. White, Ric N. Price |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 18% |
| Australia | 4 | 14% |
| Brazil | 2 | 7% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Senegal | 1 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
| Scientists | 6 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,966,919
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,375
of 4,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,234
of 360,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#24
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.