| Title |
Screening for Pancreatic Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2019.6190 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nora B. Henrikson, Erin J. Aiello Bowles, Paula R. Blasi, Caitlin C. Morrison, Matt Nguyen, Venu G. Pillarisetty, Jennifer S. Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 32% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#706,377
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#6,823
of 36,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,581
of 358,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#161
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.