↓ Skip to main content

Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
Title
Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2019
DOI 10.1001/jama.2019.10987
Pubmed ID
Authors

Preventive Services Task Force, Douglas K. Owens, Karina W. Davidson, Alex H. Krist, Michael J. Barry, Michael Cabana, Aaron B. Caughey, Chyke A. Doubeni, John W. Epling, Martha Kubik, C. Seth Landefeld, Carol M. Mangione, Lori Pbert, Michael Silverstein, Melissa A. Simon, Chien-Wen Tseng, John B. Wong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 291 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 340 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 12%
Other 34 10%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Master 32 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 123 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 143 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 534. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#47,069
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#947
of 36,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#915
of 353,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#19
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.