| Title |
Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2019.8430 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heidi D. Nelson, Miranda Pappas, Amy Cantor, Elizabeth Haney, Rebecca Holmes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 192 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 55 | 29% |
| Mexico | 15 | 8% |
| Nigeria | 8 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 6 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 145 | 76% |
| Scientists | 22 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 186 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 20% |
| Unknown | 77 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 79 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 244. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#155,220
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,316
of 36,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,944
of 354,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#54
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.