| Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of reflex testing for Lynch syndrome in women with endometrial cancer in the UK setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0221419 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tristan M. Snowsill, Neil A. J. Ryan, Emma J. Crosbie, Ian M. Frayling, D. Gareth Evans, Chris J. Hyde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 49% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 25% |
| Scientists | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,107,930
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,145
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,031
of 352,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#218
of 2,573 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,573 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.