| Title |
Technology to advance infectious disease forecasting for outbreak management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-11901-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dylan B. George, Wendy Taylor, Jeffrey Shaman, Caitlin Rivers, Brooke Paul, Tara O’Toole, Michael A. Johansson, Lynette Hirschman, Matthew Biggerstaff, Jason Asher, Nicholas G. Reich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,140,800
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#17,976
of 58,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,709
of 352,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#475
of 1,477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.