↓ Skip to main content

Sensitive sentinel mutation screening reveals differential underestimation of transmitted HIV drug resistance among demographic groups

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Sensitive sentinel mutation screening reveals differential underestimation of transmitted HIV drug resistance among demographic groups
Published in
AIDS, June 2016
DOI 10.1097/qad.0000000000001099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin-fen Li, Laurie Linley, Richard Kline, Rebecca Ziebell, Walid Heneine, Jeffrey A. Johnson

Abstract

To examine the association of majority- and minority-level transmitted HIV drug resistance (TDR) among diverse demographic populations in the United States and assess what different mutations may infer about TDR risk and engagement in care. Used sensitive assays to screen 1070 de-identified convenience plasma specimens from United States national HIV surveillance conducted in 2009-2011 on newly diagnosed persons with no evidence of antiretroviral drug use. We applied validated allele-specific PCR for five HIV reverse transcriptase mutations as sentinel markers of TDR. The total and minority-level prevalence of TDR by demographic characteristics was compared. Sensitive screening identified 72% more TDR than conventional sequencing for the five mutations assessed (13.6% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.0001), with K65R having the greatest increase (0% to 1.7%). One-third of K65R was in persons who also had ≥1 of the other mutations screened. The total TDR prevalence among whites (16.4%) and blacks (14.9%) was significantly higher than that among Hispanics/Latinos (6.4%) (p = 0.005 and 0.013, respectively). TDR prevalence was highest (23.1%) in those 13-19 years (85% black). TDR prevalence among females (72% black) was nearly as high as among MSM (47% black) (14.3% vs 15.1%, respectively). A significant proportion of TDR, primarily in older, white MSM, was undetected by conventional testing. The greatest underestimation was for rapid-decaying mutations typically associated with the source virus having recent exposure to ART. However, total TDR prevalence was highest in the <20 year age group who were predominantly black, underscoring the importance of prevention efforts for at-risk youth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Other 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Psychology 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,517,992
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from AIDS
#4,692
of 6,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,957
of 353,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS
#37
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.