| Title |
Fit-For-Purpose PD-L1 Biomarker Testing For Patient Selection in Immuno-Oncology: Guidelines For Clinical Laboratories From the Canadian Association of Pathologists-Association Canadienne Des Pathologistes (CAP-ACP)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1097/pai.0000000000000800 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol C. Cheung, Penny Barnes, Gilbert Bigras, Scott Boerner, Jagdish Butany, Fiorella Calabrese, Christian Couture, Jean Deschenes, Hala El-Zimaity, Gabor Fischer, Pierre O. Fiset, John Garratt, Laurette Geldenhuys, C. Blake Gilks, Marius Ilie, Diana Ionescu, Hyun J. Lim, Lisa Manning, Adnan Mansoor, Robert Riddell, Catherine Ross, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri, Alan Spatz, Paul E. Swanson, Victor A. Tron, Ming-Sound Tsao, Hangjun Wang, Zhaolin Xu, Emina E. Torlakovic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 32% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 48% |
| Scientists | 10 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 26% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,729,753
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology
#9
of 1,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,900
of 363,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,153 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.