↓ Skip to main content

Expert consensus on the rational clinical use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors.

Overview of attention for article published in Hormones international journal of endocrinology and metabolism, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Expert consensus on the rational clinical use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors.
Published in
Hormones international journal of endocrinology and metabolism, April 2016
DOI 10.14310/horm.2002.1659
Pubmed ID
Authors

Apostolos Achimastos, Theodoros Alexandrides, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Vasilios Athyros, Alexandra Bargiota, Eleni Bilianou, Christina Chrysochoou, Evridiki Drogari, Moses Elisaf, Emanouel Ganotakis, Ioannis Goudevenos, Ioannis Ioannidis, Genovefa Kolovou, Vasilios Kotsis, Ioannis Lekakis, Evangelos Liberopoulos, Andreas Melidonis, Vasilios Nikolaou, George Ntaios, Nikolaos Papanas, Stavros Pappas, Christos Pitsavos, Loukianos Rallidis, Dimitrios Richter, Ioannis Skoumas, Nicolaos Tentolouris, Dimitrios Tousoulis, Alexandros Tselepis, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Dimitrios Tziakas, Konstantinos Tziomalos, Panagiotis Vardas, Charalabos Vlachopoulos, Dimitrios Vlahakos

Abstract

Two proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, evolocumab and alirocumab, have recently been approved by both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. These fully human monoclonal antibodies selectively block PCSK9, thus permitting the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor to effectively recycle to the surface of liver cells. The administration of these antibodies leads to robust LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering by 50-60% on top of maximum hypolipidemic treatment. At least 4 randomized, placebo-controlled studies are under way and will address the question of whether the administration of these PCSK9 inhibitors is associated with a significant reduction of cardiovascular events. Because of the high cost associated with the use of these medications it is very important to consider which patients may gain the most benefit, at least until the results of outcome studies are available. In this Consensus paper, 34 clinicians/scientists define 3 groups of patients that should be currently considered as candidates for the use of these novel drugs. These include: 1a. Adults with established cardiovascular disease and LDL-C≥100 mg/dL while on lifestyle modifications and maximally tolerated hypolipidemic treatment, i.e. high-intensity statin + ezetimibe, 1b. Adults with diabetes and established cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease or target organ damage and LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL while on lifestyle modifications and maximally tolerated hypolipidemic treatment, i.e. high-intensity statin + ezetimibe, 2. Adults with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) without established cardiovascular disease and LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL while on lifestyle modifications and maximally tolerated hypolipidemic treatment, i.e. high-intensity statin + ezetimibe (evolocumab is also indicated in children above 12 years with homozygous FH), and 3. Adults at high or very high cardiovascular risk who are statin intolerant and have an LDL-C ≥100 and ≥130 mg/dL, respectively, while on any tolerated hypolipidemic treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 16%
Student > Master 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2016.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Hormones international journal of endocrinology and metabolism
#379
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,054
of 313,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hormones international journal of endocrinology and metabolism
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.