| Title |
Unraveling Specific Causes of Neonatal Mortality Using Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling: An Observational Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cid/ciz574 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shabir A Madhi, Jayani Pathirana, Vicky Baillie, Alane Izu, Quique Bassat, Dianna M Blau, Robert F Breiman, Martin Hale, Azwifarwi Mathunjwa, Roosecelis B Martines, Firdose L Nakwa, Susan Nzenze, Jaume Ordi, Pratima L Raghunathan, Jana M Ritter, Fatima Solomon, Sithembiso Velaphi, Jeannette Wadula, Sherif R Zaki, Richard Chawana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 43% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 39 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,101,860
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1,987
of 15,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,917
of 352,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#53
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.