↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Upfront SBRT for Oligometastatic Stage IV Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Mutational Status

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Upfront SBRT for Oligometastatic Stage IV Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Mutational Status
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials, October 2019
DOI 10.1097/coc.0000000000000608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayeon Kim, John A. Vargo, Diane C. Ling, Sushil Beriwal, Kenneth J. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 15 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 20 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,719,491
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
#269
of 1,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,383
of 366,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
#11
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,754 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.