| Title |
International Consensus on the Use of Genetics in the Management of Hereditary Angioedema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.10.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anastasios E. Germenis, Maurizio Margaglione, João Bosco Pesquero, Henriette Farkas, Sven Cichon, Dorottya Csuka, Alberto López Lera, Matija Rijavec, Stephen Jolles, Agnes Szilagyi, Margarita López Trascasa, Camila Lopes Veronez, Christian Drouet, Maria Zamanakou, Angioedema International Working Group, Sladjana Andrejevic, Emel Aygören-Pürsün, Noemi-Anna Bara, Jonathan Bernstein, Konrad Bork, Laurence Bouillet, Maria Bova, Henrik Halle Boysen, Anette Bygum, Teresa Caballero, Anthony Castaldo, Sandra Christiansen, Marco Cicardi, Jose Fabiani, Connie Katelaris, Georg Dewald, Nihal M. Gökmen, Maria Teresa Gonzalez-Quevedo, Jimmy Gooi, Vesna Grivcheva-Panovska, Anete Grumach, Roman Hakl, Gaelle Hardy, Milos Jesenak, Allen Kaplan, Michael Kirschfink, Kinga Viktoria Köhalmi, Iris Leibovich, Hilary J. Longhurst, William Lumry, Markus Magerl, Inmaculada Martinez Saguer, Imola Beatrix Nagy, Sandra Nieto, Patrik Nordenfelt, Grzegorz Porębski, Fotis Psarros, Avner Reshef, Marc A. Riedl, Farrukh Sheikh, Spath Peter, Matthaios Speletas, Maria Staevska, Marcin Stobiecki, Massimo Triggiani, Nora Veszeli, Susan Waserman, Christina Weber, Walter Wuillemin, Bruce Zuraw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 29% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,376,997
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#1,212
of 4,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,045
of 376,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#35
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.