| Title |
Standardizing CYP2D6 Genotype to Phenotype Translation: Consensus Recommendations from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CTS: Clinical & Translational Science, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cts.12692 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly E. Caudle, Katrin Sangkuhl, Michelle Whirl‐Carrillo, Jesse J. Swen, Cyrine E. Haidar, Teri E. Klein, Roseann S. Gammal, Mary V. Relling, Stuart A. Scott, Daniel L. Hertz, Henk‐Jan Guchelaar, Andrea Gaedigk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 44% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 76% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 251 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 83 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 45 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 88 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,371,531
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#54
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,971
of 374,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.