↓ Skip to main content

PulseNet and the Changing Paradigm of Laboratory-Based Surveillance for Foodborne Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Public Health Reports, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
PulseNet and the Changing Paradigm of Laboratory-Based Surveillance for Foodborne Diseases
Published in
Public Health Reports, November 2019
DOI 10.1177/0033354919881650
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristy A Kubota, William J Wolfgang, Deborah J Baker, David Boxrud, Lauren Turner, Eija Trees, Heather A Carleton, Peter Gerner-Smidt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 20 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 21 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#13,306,783
of 23,173,635 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reports
#2,039
of 2,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,065
of 364,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reports
#22
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,173,635 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.