Title |
Population Structure and Genetic Diversity among Isolates of Coccidioides posadasii in Venezuela and Surrounding Regions
|
---|---|
Published in |
mBio, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1128/mbio.01976-19 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcus M. Teixeira, Primavera Alvarado, Chandler C. Roe, George R. Thompson, José S. L. Patané, Jason W. Sahl, Paul Keim, John N. Galgiani, Anastasia P. Litvintseva, Daniel R. Matute, Bridget M. Barker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 30% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 10% |
Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
Kenya | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Hungary | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Thailand | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 16 | 53% |
Members of the public | 12 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,188,815
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from mBio
#1,683
of 6,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,094
of 473,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from mBio
#40
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.