Title |
Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Gut, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319915 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kevin J Monahan, Nicola Bradshaw, Sunil Dolwani, Bianca Desouza, Malcolm G Dunlop, James E East, Mohammad Ilyas, Asha Kaur, Fiona Lalloo, Andrew Latchford, Matthew D Rutter, Ian Tomlinson, Huw J W Thomas, James Hill, Toni Seppälä, Sue Clark, Omar Faiz, Francesc Balaguer, Monique van Leerdam, D Gareth Evans, Rodrigo Jover, Marc Tischkowitz, Helen Hanson, Sarah Gibson, Amy Taylor, Gabreilla Moeslein, Anja Wagner, JC Saurin, Tracy Smith, Jane Ashford, Jennifer Martin, Jennifer Gunningham, Mark Cooper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 41 | 31% |
Spain | 17 | 13% |
United States | 7 | 5% |
India | 6 | 5% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Ireland | 2 | 2% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 84 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 19% |
Scientists | 19 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 360 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 44 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 38 | 11% |
Other | 37 | 10% |
Student > Master | 33 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 6% |
Other | 56 | 16% |
Unknown | 131 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 34% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 2% |
Other | 38 | 11% |
Unknown | 138 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#420,728
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#257
of 7,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,998
of 482,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#4
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.