| Title |
Gene-microbiota interactions contribute to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aad9948 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiutung Chu, Arya Khosravi, Indah P Kusumawardhani, Alice H K Kwon, Anilton C Vasconcelos, Larissa D Cunha, Anne E Mayer, Yue Shen, Wei-Li Wu, Amal Kambal, Stephan R Targan, Ramnik J Xavier, Peter B Ernst, Douglas R Green, Dermot P B McGovern, Herbert W Virgin, Sarkis K Mazmanian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 172 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 55 | 32% |
| Spain | 10 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 109 | 63% |
| Scientists | 43 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 626 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 602 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 137 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 118 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 10% |
| Professor | 32 | 5% |
| Other | 109 | 17% |
| Unknown | 104 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 160 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 98 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 97 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 57 | 9% |
| Unknown | 118 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 232. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#167,449
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from Science
#4,983
of 83,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,030
of 313,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#86
of 1,139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.