| Title |
Invasive Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae Infection Among Adults With HIV in Metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, 2008-2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2019.18800 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren F. Collins, Fiona P. Havers, Amy Tunali, Stephanie Thomas, Julie A. Clennon, Zanthia Wiley, Melissa Tobin-D’Angelo, Tonia Parrott, Timothy D. Read, Sarah W. Satola, Robert A. Petit, Monica M. Farley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 55% |
| Georgia | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,315,283
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#9,924
of 36,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,696
of 475,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#218
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.