| Title |
Effects of Influenza Vaccination in the United States During the 2018–2019 Influenza Season
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cid/ciz1244 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessie R Chung, Melissa A Rolfes, Brendan Flannery, Pragati Prasad, Alissa O’Halloran, Shikha Garg, Alicia M Fry, James A Singleton, Manish Patel, Carrie Reed, Sara S Kim, Emily T Martin, Arnold S Monto, Michael L Jackson, Lisa A Jackson, Huong Q McLean, Edward A Belongia, Jennifer P King, Richard K Zimmerman, Mary Patricia Nowalk, G K Balasubramani, Todd M Bear, Robert Hickey, Jonathan M Raviotta, Joe Suyama, Alexandra J Weissman, John V Williams, Manjusha Gaglani, Chandni Raiyani, Michael Smith, Kempapura Murthy, Lydia Clipper, Michael Reis, Arundhati Rao, Kimberly Walker, Marcus Volz, Manohar Mutnal, Charisse N Cummings, Kimberly Yousey-Hindes, Chelsea McMullen, Shua J Chai, Evan J Anderson, Maya L Monroe, Ilene Risk, Rachel Herlihy, Sue Kim, Nancy Spina, Laurie Billing, William Schaffner, H Keipp Talbot, Ann Thomas, Melissa McMahon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Mexico | 5 | 4% |
| Turkey | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 55 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 111 | 78% |
| Scientists | 16 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2023.
All research outputs
#193,990
of 25,802,847 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#438
of 16,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,616
of 480,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#6
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,802,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.