↓ Skip to main content

Division of the genus Chryseobacterium: Observation of discontinuities in amino acid identity values, a possible consequence of major extinction events, guides transfer of nine species to the genus…

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Division of the genus Chryseobacterium: Observation of discontinuities in amino acid identity values, a possible consequence of major extinction events, guides transfer of nine species to the genus Epilithonimonas, eleven species to the genus Kaistella, and three species to the genus Halpernia gen. nov., with description of Kaistella daneshvariae sp. nov. and Epilithonimonas vandammei sp. nov. derived from clinical specimens
Published in
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, January 2020
DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.003935
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ainsley C. Nicholson, Christopher A. Gulvik, Anne M. Whitney, Ben W. Humrighouse, Melissa E. Bell, Barry Holmes, Arnie G. Steigerwalt, Aaron Villarma, Mili Sheth, Dhwani Batra, Lori A. Rowe, Mark Burroughs, Jessica C. Pryor, Jean-François Bernardet, Celia Hugo, Peter Kämpfer, Jeffrey D. Newman, John R. McQuiston

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 17 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,890,000
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#213
of 10,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,353
of 473,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#4
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.