| Title |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis bloodstream infection prevalence, diagnosis, and mortality risk in seriously ill adults with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30695-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A Barr, Joseph M Lewis, Nicholas Feasey, Charlotte Schutz, Andrew D Kerkhoff, Shevin T Jacob, Ben Andrews, Paul Kelly, Shabir Lakhi, Levy Muchemwa, Helio A Bacha, David J Hadad, Richard Bedell, Monique van Lettow, Rony Zachariah, John A Crump, David Alland, Elizabeth L Corbett, Krishnamoorthy Gopinath, Sarman Singh, Rulan Griesel, Gary Maartens, Marc Mendelson, Amy M Ward, Christopher M Parry, Elizabeth A Talbot, Patricia Munseri, Susan E Dorman, Neil Martinson, Maunank Shah, Kevin Cain, Charles M Heilig, Jay K Varma, Anne von Gottberg, Leonard Sacks, Douglas Wilson, S Bertel Squire, David G Lalloo, Gerry Davies, Graeme Meintjes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 19% |
| Mexico | 6 | 11% |
| South Africa | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Botswana | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 59% |
| Scientists | 12 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 203 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 21% |
| Unknown | 80 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 90 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#851,068
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1,225
of 6,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,196
of 392,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#77
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.